Search this site:


Categories:

February 11, 2006 12:03 AM

Broken: Sproutz architect's special note

SproutzReader Dom writes in:

The other day, I came across Sproutz furniture, which has a cute idea for making formaldehyde-free children's furniture for classrooms and homes. However, when I clicked on their "technical info" link, I was greeted with a "Note to architects," which is completely unreadable.

The kicker is that it's an image!

How could they not have seen how impossible this is to read? Maybe they think that architects have a special power to read white text on noisy backgrounds :)

Comments:

they just hate architects.

Posted by: gmangw at February 11, 2006 01:03 AM

Something I'm noticing is that when it was scaled down for the thumbnail, it looked like a standard green marble background. Still broken? Yeah, but I think I can see what they were trying to do now.

I think what's really broken, though, is that we're putting furniture with formaldehyde in it in reach of children anyway. I had no idea...

Posted by: =David at February 11, 2006 01:09 AM

I wonder if people who are color blind have an advantage to reading this or don't even notice the text at all. I had a classmate in HS who was color blind. A girl would write silly stuff about him on the blackboard with green chalk and he wouldn't even notice that there was anything there.

Posted by: Confused Shopper at February 11, 2006 01:20 AM

yeah, that's architext, a special architect code that only they can read. If you were to read that label, you might get the idea that you could install a chair w/o the help of a qualified prof. Then you'd sit in the chair, and die.

Posted by: abcdario at February 11, 2006 01:32 AM

hey, wait...did they just change it on the site? I can read it now.

Posted by: honkeytime at February 11, 2006 01:35 AM

I'll tell you what's really wack: They sell something called a "phonograph stand." If they're still using these so-called "phonographs" in schools, our districts must be in worse financial shape than we can imagine.

http://tinyurl.com/788vy

"Sally, would you help teacher stack these wax cylinders before we break for Castor-oil and Necco wafers?"

Posted by: abcdario at February 11, 2006 01:43 AM

Compare the image in IE and Firefox. It looks great in IE, crap in Firefox. Some weird VML, or something.

Posted by: John Bauman at February 11, 2006 01:59 AM

_@_v - idiots used a .jpg image with transparancy. if you open it in a graphics programme and unmask the tranparancy you can read it o.k.

_@_v - it's blather about how their stuff conforms to the "green code"...

Posted by: she-snailie_@_v at February 11, 2006 02:08 AM

In Internet Explorer it is displayed as a well-readable text (with a background image), not as an image. If you look at the HTML-source of that page, you notice the !--[if gte vml 1] markup (it is known as conditional comment and it means "in case if your browser's VML support version is 1 or greater"), after which there are instructions to create a background rectangle (from green JPEG-image "image001.jpg") with round corners (using VML) and then to display normal text over it. It is followed by the ![if !vml] markup, which means that VML non-capable browsers should use the GIF-image "image002.jpg" instead (and yes, that GIF-image is really messed up). By the way, in the end there is a comment "This HTML was automatically created with Macromedia Fireworks 4.0" (so they probably did not write it by hand).

Perhaps Firefox doesn't do VML (Vector Markup Language) or doesn't understand conditional comments.

Also, it seems Macromedia Fireworks 4.0 doesn't produce proper HTML (nor proper XHTML either), because the page doesn't validate (using the W3C Markup Validation Service), even if you pre-select character encoding manually to iso-8859-1 and try different Doctypes.

Posted by: FL at February 11, 2006 07:03 AM

I can read it, albiet not very well. It says "Sproutz(TM) line qualifies for U.S. Green Building Council's LEED rating system. Sproutz(TM) Furniture satisfies point requirements in both the Material and Resources and Indoor Air Environmental Quality Categories..."

/too long.

so, it's indecipherable, perhaps, perhaps hard to read also, but not impossible. Still broken, though, in my opinion..

Posted by: Bob at February 11, 2006 07:47 AM

Bob, I was referring to the original page, http://www.sproutz.biz/ProuductInformation/IntroducingTheSproutzLine.htm (not to this screen-shot on This Is Broken). If you visit the original page using Internet Explorer then you can perfectly read, select, copy and paste the text from there (so no need to strain your eyes).

The picture showed on This Is Broken seems to be the result of a browser compatibility issue. In this article there is no mention of what browser did the author use to visit Sproutz products' page before taking this picture.

The Sproutz website has a plain-text version of the text, but it is displayed only if a browser supports both VML and conditional comments. Otherwise, a nearly unreadable image is shown.

Also note that it doesn't matter what browser you use to read this (i.e. current) article because it is only the resulting screen-shot given here. Visit the aforementioned original page instead to see the text.

Posted by: FL at February 11, 2006 08:58 AM

i'm running firefox and my eyes are bleeding.

Posted by: schwal at February 11, 2006 09:09 AM

So you have to find the right program to open it in before you can read it??? Broken

Posted by: oldenise at February 11, 2006 09:09 AM

Yeah shame to only test a page in a non-standards based browser like IE...usually pages that are broken in Firefox and not IE is due to that..

Posted by: infinity at February 11, 2006 03:16 PM

It really wouldn't have been hard at all to make a version of that that works with most browsers. They could have just used a table with that green background and typed the text in the table cell, not hard at all.

Posted by: john russell at February 11, 2006 03:41 PM

I'm not quite sure how Macromedia Fireworks would produce ugly code like that... especially seeing as VML is a Microsoft-proprietary XML extension, as far as I know. I think they took a page from Fireworks and then edited it in FrontPage, which has been known to produce ugly, standards-incompliant code like that featured on the site.

Oh, yes, and the only browser that supports VML, as far as I know, is Internet Explorer for Windows. Not even the now-defunct Mac version of IE could process it... much less any other Mac browser.

Posted by: codeman38 at February 11, 2006 04:26 PM

My theory is further supported by the fact that several other pages on the site have a tag specifying that they were created in FrontPage.

Oh, yes, and the home page (which features the FrontPage reference in its HTML) has the wonderful title tag of "Introducing Spoutz." Great proofreading, guys.

Posted by: codeman38 at February 11, 2006 04:43 PM

It's just the site that doesn't work in Firefox.

@abcdario: Phonograph technically means any device that can record sound. However, in the English language the word means a record player.

Posted by: Fuzzy at February 11, 2006 06:26 PM

I bet the reason that schools still have record players or phonographs is probably because some company out there still has several thousand units in inventory. They are probably giving them away as a tax deduction. I remember when I was in school (finished HS 6 years ago) every classroom in every school in my district had the same record player. Coincidence? A great bargain for buying in bulk? I think not. And Sproutz is taking advantage of this situation. And whoever is still using Internet Explorer is broken.

Posted by: Confused Shopper at February 11, 2006 08:46 PM

"And whoever is still using Internet Explorer is broken."

why?

Posted by: gmangw at February 11, 2006 09:06 PM

It is plain text in IE!!! (the link)

Architects Special Note

Sproutz™ line qualifies for US Green Building Council’s LEED rating system. Sproutz™ furniture satisfies point requirements in both the Material and Resources and Indoor Air Environmental Quality categories. By using an agrifiber material made from a rapidly renewable resource, sunflower seed hulls, and a Urethane based bonding agent containing limited VOC’s and formaldehyde, we offer an earth friendly and valuable solution that can be easily incorporated into “green” building projects.

Posted by: hjghj at February 11, 2006 10:20 PM

This is why.

Posted by: Researcher at February 11, 2006 10:22 PM

Sorry about the doulbe post, but here's a better article.

Posted by: Researcher at February 11, 2006 10:26 PM

I am only 13 but i can read that fine

Posted by: spencer at February 12, 2006 03:04 PM

Yeah In IE it is using the graphic as a background and printing the text..in anything else it uses the image with the text.. you can see this by viewing the source on the page... Broken

Posted by: infinity306 at February 12, 2006 04:10 PM

Indeed it is messed up in Firefox. Saw it on both, major difference. Looks OK on IE. It's just one of those programming clashes.

Posted by: zero??? at February 12, 2006 07:42 PM

David Pogue writes a weekly column called Circuits. His latest included a review of the OpenX and Pyranna. You may have to subscribe to the Times online to read his article:

OpenX and Pyranna

Posted by: Confused Shopper at February 13, 2006 12:08 AM

Oddly enough, anything created with a Microsoft product and exported to HTML, such as result from Microsoft Publisher, seems to always render as an image in Mozilla Firefox, and how it's supposed to look in Windows Internet Explorer. Try it.

I think it's just a way for Microsoft to get people to use their products. If they want a website to be attractive, it has to be W3C compliant and hard coded.

But, since that won't be happening in the near future, someone already made the IETab extension for Firefox.

Posted by: Trent Chernecki at February 13, 2006 01:55 AM

Having different renderings for different browsers for what is essentially plain text is a very poor design decision.

What makes matters worse is that the fallback GIF image is illegible. It's not much of a fallback.

Posted by: Carlos Gomez at February 13, 2006 12:41 PM

Yeah. It's more of a fallintoaspikepit.

Posted by: Jello B. at February 14, 2006 02:09 AM

The webpage is broken and not W3 compliant. Fireworks sucks big time. I can not read the image with Opera, Netscape, or Firefox browsers.

Jonathan

Posted by: Jonathan at February 19, 2006 10:30 PM

Architects Special Note

Sproutz™ line qualifies for US Green Building Council’s LEED rating system. Sproutz™ furniture satisfies point requirements in both the Material and Resources and Indoor Air Environmental Quality categories. By using an agrifiber material made from a rapidly renewable resource, sunflower seed hulls, and a Urethane based bonding agent containing limited VOC’s and formaldehyde, we offer an earth friendly and valuable solution that can be easily incorporated into “green” building projects.

Posted by: at April 21, 2006 06:41 PM

Maybe it's one of those pictures you have to look through the red glasses to see.

Posted by: joe at May 21, 2006 04:34 PM

Comments on this entry are closed



Previous Posts: