 |
A project to make businesses more aware of their customer experience, and how to fix it. By Mark Hurst. |
| About Mark Hurst | Mark's Gel Conference | New York Times Story on This Is Broken | Newsletter: Subscribe | RSS Feed |
Search this site:
Categories:
- Advertising
- Current Affairs
- Customer Service
- Fixed
- Food and Drink
- Just for Fun
- Misc
- Not broken
- Place
- Product Design
- Signs
- Travel
- Web/Tech
Previous: Many infomercials | Main | Next: Acura navigation system interface
April 10, 2006 12:03 AM
Broken: U.S. Marshal scanned stamp
This was "scanned" by the US Marshals. Wink wink. If you know what we mean.
(Why use quotes around "scanned"? Wasn't it just... scanned?)
There was a billboard near my house that said:
Southside Chevy...where "PRICE" sells cars!
They don't believe that "price" sells cars?
A newspaper ad for the same place said:
The Best "DEALS" in town!
Hmm....
Yes. Broken.
Or should I say...
this is "broken."
I live in a Jewish neighborhood and the sign outside one business here said
Get all your "Passover" needs
???
reg
Perhaps they mean "scanned" in the sense of opened the package, watched any DVDs in it, test-wore any underpants which might be in it, etc, etc, then sealed it back up.
Hey, you never know. :)
Clearly this is simply proper attribution of a quotation. Why would "Scanned," by US Marshalls Office be any different than "A rose by any other name would smell as sweet," by William Shakespeare?
••-~ - Might be in quotes as a throwback to when it was "proper" grammar to put colloqialisms in quotes.
Odd...
You would think that when they "scan" it, they would sign it. Otherwise anyone could just slap the sticker on the box and it would look "scanned."
No, no. It's the title of an autobiographical essay. Security at the U.S. Marshall's Office has gotten go efficient that they're writing essays. Personally, I found "Scanned" rather dry, yet thought-provoking. The end was rather predictable, though.
"Comment", by karen.
Aside from the fact that it is a rubber stamp impression and not a sticker I agree entierly with CGB Spender and joh.
Quotes arn't for emphasis. this is one thing that "REALLY" gets on my nerves. Like fliers that say that, say, a class is "free." it's like there's a trick. Just like hot dogs arn't food, they're "food"....
How about no signature or date? That's pretty broken too. "scanned", i.e. someone opened it and looked at it, but we don't know who or when. Great. Maybe they should just leave a sticker with a smiley face that says "big brother approved"!
A Chinese restaurant near my house used to advertise Ginger Fried "Beef" and Kung Pao "Chicken" ... I never had the nerve to eat there.
My favourite example is from the in-store ads in Tesco (UK super-market), which read 'Tesco "value" promise'.
I play a MUD, and I've met more than a couple users who use singlequotes for emphasis. "Well 'this' is an interesting sentence!" I've never gotten to the bottom of where this practice comes from, but I'm guessing it's a cultural thing. Is there a part of the country that uses quotes for emphasis? Is it possible this isn't as wrong and stupid as I've thought for so many years? Or is it just wrong and stupid?
Can someone explain who the US Marshalls are and why they scan packages?
And did anyone notice that the spaces for where initial and date should go aren't filled in? That's obviously broken too.
Oh, I miss the days when things were sent in brown paper wrappers(wink, wink...) & weren't scanned by the feds.
They should get credit for admitting having intercepted the package. I suspect they usually check out a lot more than they admit. Maybe they damaged the XXX DVD.
why would the Marshalls being scanning US Mail? Unless it was en-route to the Bureau of Prisons, wouldn't this be the ICE's domain to scan mail?
I don't have a problem with the "quotation" marks. It was probably a choice left to the discretion of the clerk ordering the stamps. I would have more of a problem if the gov't decided to re-order all the stamps to eliminate the "quotation" marks.
It may or may not be an grammerical an error but really it's insignificant.
The use of 'single quotes' in muds probably arises from the fact that there is no other way to underline or bold something in ascii text.
You don't *have* to emphasize ASCII text with single quotes. There -are- plenty of other ways to EMPHASIZE it.☺☻
This reminds me of a pet store named Pet Supplies "Plus". And why is the "Plus" there? Is there another pet store called Pet Supplies? Perhaps Pet Supplies "Minus", with all your substandard pet supply needs? (Speaking of which, PetSmart stocks "Ultra Holistic Pet Food"... but that's a tale for another day.
I'd "Scan" that. "It" is always a "blast." Heh heh, if you "get" my "drift". "Yeah" "you" "get" "it."
Don't "hurt" me!
I have this at my school, where it says: This area is "off limits" except for during "passing periods"
For JAC -
I disagree that there is no wrong or stupid - only different from how you do things. I make money to live on by working - while some others choose to knock little old ladies down and steal their money - that is both wrong and stupid (not merely different). To say there is no wrong or stupid - only different - that is BROKEN!
For Just Me:
You are right! I have changed my mind. To compare a conversation on grammar and punctuation to committing a crime "is" wrong and stupid. Thank you for opening my eyes.
JAC,
Just because he's using hyperbole doesn't mean there is no wrong way to use the english language :)
My question is: Why are the Federal Marshalls scanning mail in the first place?
That and the fact that it is "stamped" but not signed and dated.
Hello, "1984".
>
Explosive and biological detection in a lot of areas (especially the US Mail) has been a priority since 9/11 and the anthrax attacks.
Folks this is the federal government at work. Any expectation of proper punctuation is seriously misplaced...
I think 9/11 gave Bushy Wushy the perfect excuse to "Scan" your mail. if "he" wants to, why shouldnt "he" be allowed to say if "flowers" for your "grandma" is really a "threat" to security? After all, couldnt the package that clearly is too thin for any sort of explosive be considered the latest advance in bomb technology.
Obviously, not broken.
Comments on this entry are closed
Previous: Many infomercials | Main | Next: Acura navigation system interface
I guess it's just a word in quotes. Does everything that's in "quotes" mean something other than what it's "supposed" to? (wink)
Posted by: Trent Chernecki at April 10, 2006 12:07 AM